Abstract
This case study examines the complexities of designing, funding, and legally complying with adaptive and inclusive playgrounds for children with disabilities. Inclusive playgrounds prioritize social integration by enabling children of all abilities to play together, while adaptive playgrounds focus on accommodating specific functional needs through specialized equipment. Both approaches support physical, cognitive, and social development and promote equitable community participation. Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), mandate accessibility in public and private recreational spaces, yet compliance alone does not guarantee meaningful inclusion. Additionally, funding remains a significant challenge, with full-scale adaptive playgrounds often costing hundreds of thousands of dollars, requiring multi-source financing through community contributions, grants, and municipal programs. This case study centers on concerned parents led by the Sports and Recreation Coordinator, who faced legal, financial, and community-based challenges in proposing a playground adjacent to a school. Despite broad community support, the city council ultimately suspended the proposal due to concerns over cost, location, and compliance. The case highlights the tension between financial feasibility and legal and ethical obligations, illustrating the need for integrated strategies that balance accessibility, inclusivity, and sustainable community investment in recreational infrastructure.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Miller, J. J., & Lee, J. W. (2026). Play for All: Financial and Legal Dilemmas in Proposing Adaptive Playgrounds. The COSMA Journal. https://doi.org/10.25035/cosma.03.01.03Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Sports Management Commons, Sports Studies Commons
