Management Faculty Publications
Employee voice behavior and perceived control: does remote work environment matter?
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose This study's purpose is to explore the difference in employee voice behavior along with its modalities and employee perceived control in a remote vs an in-office work situation. Design/methodology/approach Employees who worked remotely and in-person at a local municipal government in the Great Lakes Region of the United States were surveyed. Findings Findings suggest voice behavior and perceived control are stable attitudes and not impacted by a move from in-person to remote work. Participants indicated both Zoom staff meetings and Zoom one-to-one meetings with their supervisor were important; however, only Zoom one-to-one meetings with the supervisor were indicated to be satisfactory. Practical implications This study suggests that organizations considering moving some of their operations to a fully remote work situation would not experience differences in employee voice or perceived control. Implications related to utilizing specific communication modalities are also discussed. Originality/value This is the only study that focuses on differences in employee voice, its modalities and perceived control comparing in-person vs remote work.
Repository Citation
O'Brien, Kelly Irene; Ravichandran, Swathi; and Brodke, Michelle, "Employee voice behavior and perceived control: does remote work environment matter?" (2024). Management Faculty Publications. 44.
https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/management_pub/44
Publication Date
2024
Publication Title
Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship
Publisher
Emerald Publishing Limited
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-12-2022-0288
Volume
12
Issue
1
Start Page No.
71
End Page No.
86