On the Continued Misinterpretation of Stereotype Threat as Accounting for Black-White Differences on Cognitive Tests
Steele and Aronson (1995) showed that stereotype threat affects the test performance of stereotyped groups. A careful reading shows that threat affects test performance but does not eliminate Black–White mean score gaps. Sackett et al. (2004) reviewed characterization of this research in scholarly articles, textbooks, and popular press, and found that many mistakenly inferred that removing stereotype threats eliminated the Black– White performance gap. We examined whether the rate of mischaracterization of Steele and Aronson had decreased in the 15 years since Sackett et al. highlighted the common misinterpretation. We found that the misinterpretation rate dropped from 90.9% to 62.8% in journal articles and from 55.6% to 41.18% in textbooks, though this is only statistically significant in journal articles.
Tomeh, Dana H. and Sackett, Paul R.
"On the Continued Misinterpretation of Stereotype Threat as Accounting for Black-White Differences on Cognitive Tests,"
Personnel Assessment and Decisions: Number 8
, Article 1.
Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/pad/vol8/iss1/1
Human Resources Management Commons, Industrial and Organizational Psychology Commons, Other Psychology Commons