Making the Most of the Peer Review Process

Authors

Christy Galletta Horner, Bowling Green State UniversityFollow
Sherri L. Horner, Bowling Green State UniversityFollow
Richard Henry Maguire, Bowling Green State UniversityFollow

Keywords

mentoring; publication process

Abstract

In this brief mentoring corner article, we focus on defining what different editorial decisions mean (e.g., accept with revisions; revise and resubmit; reject: revise and resubmit), discussing factors you might consider when deciding what to do after receiving a decision (e.g., resubmit or move on) and considering how to best approach the revisions. We also provide guidance on effective communication with editors, including an example of a successful response to review table and cover letter.

Recommended Citation

Galletta Horner, Christy; Horner, Sherri L.; and Maguire, Richard Henry (2023) "Making the Most of the Peer Review Process," Mid-Western Educational Researcher: Vol. 35: Iss. 2, Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25035/mwer.35.02.06
Available at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/mwer/vol35/iss2/6

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.25035/mwer.35.02.06