•  
  •  
 

DOI

https://doi.org/10.25035/jsmahs.10.02.06

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding relationships between blood flow and muscle inflexibility in the lower leg can support improved healthcare competency. Sports medicine practitioners might use the reference ranges and knowledge of relationships among these variables to support effective health screenings among their competitive runners. These variables have been linked in other areas of the body where inflexibility in the pectoralis minor and scalene muscles have been associated with diminished blood flow to the upper limb. No studies, however, have examined the relationship between vascular and mobility characteristics in the lower legs of runners. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between blood flow in the posterior tibial artery and ankle range of motion (ROM) among competitive runners. Methods: Blood flow in the posterior tibial artery and ankle ROM were measured bilaterally on twenty-five, asymptomatic collegiate track athletes (15 males, 10 females, age = 20.0±1.2 years, height = 171.5±10.2 cm, mass = 66.7±13.7 kg) using diagnostic ultrasound and standard goniometry, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between blood flow in the posterior tibial artery and ROM of the ankle joint. Results: Findings revealed no significant relationship between blood flow in the dominant leg’s posterior tibial artery and dorsiflexion (r=.14, P=.52, CI95% = -0.27 – 0.51) or plantarflexion (r=-.32, P=.12, CI95% = -0.63 – 0.09) and no significant relationship between blood flow in the non-dominant leg’s posterior tibial artery and dorsiflexion (r=-.02, P=.93; CI95% = -0.41 – 0.38) or plantarflexion (r=-.02, P=.92; CI95% = -0.41 – 0.38). Conclusion: While muscle inflexibility is associated with compromised blood flow in other body regions, findings of this study demonstrated no relationship between the variables within the lower legs of a sample of competitive runners. Sports medicine practitioners should consider these findings in their efforts to predict, prevent, and manage potential vascular and musculoskeletal adaptations among clients/patients who are competitive runners.

Additional Files
Figure 1 bw 350 dpi.jpg (1102 kB)
Figure 1
Figure 2 bw 350 dpi.jpg (93 kB)
Figure 2
Figure 3 bw 350 dpi.jpg (106 kB)
Figure 3
Evidence of IRB Approval.pdf (140 kB)
Evidence of IRB approval

Attestation

1

Download

Share

COinS