Interdisciplinary Studies Ph.D. Dissertations
Arguments of Functional Theory & The Iran-Nuclear Deal of 2015
Date of Award
2018
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Department
Interdisciplinary Studies
First Advisor
Joshua Atkinson (Advisor)
Second Advisor
Michael Bradie (Committee Member)
Third Advisor
Lee Nickoson (Committee Member)
Fourth Advisor
Mary Hare (Other)
Abstract
Functional theory has been used internationally to study the content of political debates. Some scholars have critiqued the theory as being too culturally restricted. This study contends that values are inherent to human argumentation and uses the Aristotelian values of prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance to expand the analytic power of functional theory. A qualitative content analysis was applied using functional theory with values on news outlet articles from 2013 – 2015 from Al Jazeera, BBC, USA Today, New York Times, and Washington Post. The articles concerned the Iran Deal of 2015 and were accessed online. Themes generated include: knowledge, understanding, wisdom, productivity, safety, trust, benefits, concessions, fairness, rights, hope, faith, power, and patience. Using values with functional theory was found to expand the latter’s analytic power cross culturally and across fields.
Recommended Citation
Lauer, Jeffrey A., "Arguments of Functional Theory & The Iran-Nuclear Deal of 2015" (2018). Interdisciplinary Studies Ph.D. Dissertations. 2.
https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/interdisc_diss/2